<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deadliest Warrior: Season 2 (hopefully)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidgillhespy.com/2009/06/deadliest-warrior-season-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidgillhespy.com/2009/06/deadliest-warrior-season-2/</link>
	<description>The portfolio and blog of david justin gillhespy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 15:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jutt</title>
		<link>http://davidgillhespy.com/2009/06/deadliest-warrior-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Jutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 15:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgillhespy.com/?p=348#comment-181</guid>
		<description>i respect everybody, and you cant change history, rajputs were amazing warriors, and so were mughals and sikhs were aswell. 
i think mughals were the most ruthless, rajputs were the most skilled and sikhs were the bravest. 
i mean to say, in todays day and age were on the front line because were brave, and rajputs a royal so you cannot take anything away from anyone, we fight for our rajputs today the way they did in the time before our religion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i respect everybody, and you cant change history, rajputs were amazing warriors, and so were mughals and sikhs were aswell.<br />
i think mughals were the most ruthless, rajputs were the most skilled and sikhs were the bravest.<br />
i mean to say, in todays day and age were on the front line because were brave, and rajputs a royal so you cannot take anything away from anyone, we fight for our rajputs today the way they did in the time before our religion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khalistan</title>
		<link>http://davidgillhespy.com/2009/06/deadliest-warrior-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>khalistan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 18:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgillhespy.com/?p=348#comment-180</guid>
		<description>I was a bit upset with sikhs calling them selfs rajputs on the show. They may well be Rajputs but i think they were just acting. Sikhs are good warriors and so are rajputs. im glad the Roman got beaten.Apart from the Kandha and katar they should have used better weopons. Rajputs of punjab were cowards but the a few from rajasthan and other areas were lethal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a bit upset with sikhs calling them selfs rajputs on the show. They may well be Rajputs but i think they were just acting. Sikhs are good warriors and so are rajputs. im glad the Roman got beaten.Apart from the Kandha and katar they should have used better weopons. Rajputs of punjab were cowards but the a few from rajasthan and other areas were lethal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://davidgillhespy.com/2009/06/deadliest-warrior-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 15:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgillhespy.com/?p=348#comment-179</guid>
		<description>@ Raju&#039;s Dad, you proved my point in ur last post mate!..&#039;rajputs are pusssies&#039;..yes sikhs took the name singh(because u dont deserve it) we took ur weapons( coz sikh use them better than rajputs) and ur people..(there was a massive conversion frm rajput to sikhs)..ask ur self these questions why are rajputs fighting a sikh cause? and ur dumb brain will hopefully comprehend. ask ur self why we could not even protect our women and  had to go to the Sikh gurus for help? where we such cowards? the ans is obvious raju&#039;s dad. Rajputs have a good history of bravery but there comming generations cud not hold that bravery when the mughals invaded india. they had the biggest army, the biggest empire and rule with money and weapons..then how come rajput raja cud not hold a good resistence and protect their country and people..this is my question? and a guerilla force is formed in the jungles of india (Sikhs)few hundred men who very a more effective resistence to the mughal tyrnny. Lets talk on records and not false egotisms. so to ur statement i want to say it is easy to be a rajput sit on a expensive thrones, gamble ur daughters with ur oppressors for LAND. but it is hard to stand for the common man who the rajputs completely ignored and form a fighting force who fights &#039;for the people&#039; which terrorised the invading army. Rajus dad maybe u shud think about that! Reaseach on the battle of chamkur, battle with Ahmed Shah Abdali,check out Banda singh Bahadurs campaign, reasearch on these few battles fought by the sikh and u will see the kind of warriors u are talking about!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Raju&#8217;s Dad, you proved my point in ur last post mate!..&#8217;rajputs are pusssies&#8217;..yes sikhs took the name singh(because u dont deserve it) we took ur weapons( coz sikh use them better than rajputs) and ur people..(there was a massive conversion frm rajput to sikhs)..ask ur self these questions why are rajputs fighting a sikh cause? and ur dumb brain will hopefully comprehend. ask ur self why we could not even protect our women and  had to go to the Sikh gurus for help? where we such cowards? the ans is obvious raju&#8217;s dad. Rajputs have a good history of bravery but there comming generations cud not hold that bravery when the mughals invaded india. they had the biggest army, the biggest empire and rule with money and weapons..then how come rajput raja cud not hold a good resistence and protect their country and people..this is my question? and a guerilla force is formed in the jungles of india (Sikhs)few hundred men who very a more effective resistence to the mughal tyrnny. Lets talk on records and not false egotisms. so to ur statement i want to say it is easy to be a rajput sit on a expensive thrones, gamble ur daughters with ur oppressors for LAND. but it is hard to stand for the common man who the rajputs completely ignored and form a fighting force who fights &#8216;for the people&#8217; which terrorised the invading army. Rajus dad maybe u shud think about that! Reaseach on the battle of chamkur, battle with Ahmed Shah Abdali,check out Banda singh Bahadurs campaign, reasearch on these few battles fought by the sikh and u will see the kind of warriors u are talking about!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sukhdev</title>
		<link>http://davidgillhespy.com/2009/06/deadliest-warrior-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Sukhdev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 13:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgillhespy.com/?p=348#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Ummmm - I watched the show and it was sikhs who did all the demos....?  What does that tell you guys...comment please...

Chardi Khala</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummmm &#8211; I watched the show and it was sikhs who did all the demos&#8230;.?  What does that tell you guys&#8230;comment please&#8230;</p>
<p>Chardi Khala</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sher</title>
		<link>http://davidgillhespy.com/2009/06/deadliest-warrior-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>sher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 23:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgillhespy.com/?p=348#comment-177</guid>
		<description>@ raju&#039;s dad.
This entire discussion is supposed to be based on the warriors, the military. When you talk about sikhism the religion, you cross many lines. and at your last sentence, I&#039;d say that the beauty and what makes sikhism special is that no one is better than another. There is no prehistoric ignorance in our religion ( no offense to whichever religion you are from)but this is the 21st century and the values you are taught in an enlightened &quot;western&quot;  family are very similar to the values I would have been taught 500 years ago. I don&#039;t know much about the battles that the Sikhs, the Mughals, and the Rajput fought in but I know one thing and you can say all the shit the want to about it. We fought for our religion. Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji enlightened us with peace (which is not being what you call pussy) And then when turmoil became evident Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji enlightened us once again, this time to become warriors of peace.
You can say all you want and whatever you like but if you want to talk about one religion being better than another, you should consider going back a few centuries. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ raju&#8217;s dad.<br />
This entire discussion is supposed to be based on the warriors, the military. When you talk about sikhism the religion, you cross many lines. and at your last sentence, I&#8217;d say that the beauty and what makes sikhism special is that no one is better than another. There is no prehistoric ignorance in our religion ( no offense to whichever religion you are from)but this is the 21st century and the values you are taught in an enlightened &#8220;western&#8221;  family are very similar to the values I would have been taught 500 years ago. I don&#8217;t know much about the battles that the Sikhs, the Mughals, and the Rajput fought in but I know one thing and you can say all the shit the want to about it. We fought for our religion. Sri Guru Nanak Dev Ji enlightened us with peace (which is not being what you call pussy) And then when turmoil became evident Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji enlightened us once again, this time to become warriors of peace.<br />
You can say all you want and whatever you like but if you want to talk about one religion being better than another, you should consider going back a few centuries. <img src='http://davidgillhespy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghatorkach</title>
		<link>http://davidgillhespy.com/2009/06/deadliest-warrior-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghatorkach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 05:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgillhespy.com/?p=348#comment-176</guid>
		<description>The above shows why the Mughals and later the British were successful. If these different groups had stood together, history might have been very different. Won&#039;t you ever learn?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above shows why the Mughals and later the British were successful. If these different groups had stood together, history might have been very different. Won&#8217;t you ever learn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raju's dad</title>
		<link>http://davidgillhespy.com/2009/06/deadliest-warrior-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>raju's dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 19:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgillhespy.com/?p=348#comment-175</guid>
		<description>the sikhs are cocks who were the biggest pussies on earth. they stole all there knowlege of arms from the rajputs. i wonder what guru gobind was thinking, hmmm lets steel the title singh from the rajputs, so sikhs stop getting taken for idiots! any cock can be sikh, but to be rajput you have to be born one..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the sikhs are cocks who were the biggest pussies on earth. they stole all there knowlege of arms from the rajputs. i wonder what guru gobind was thinking, hmmm lets steel the title singh from the rajputs, so sikhs stop getting taken for idiots! any cock can be sikh, but to be rajput you have to be born one..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://davidgillhespy.com/2009/06/deadliest-warrior-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 17:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgillhespy.com/?p=348#comment-174</guid>
		<description>@ singh ur a pussy jus to prove you  point u are manupulating history on this site. mughals where forcing rajputs to covert and  to save ur land rajputs where fighting the mughals but when cud not overpower them u married ur daughter to gain a political edge, typical for a coward to do..rajputs paid taxes to the mughals so that they are not raided, another example of cowardice... rajputs have been ancient warriors, tru, but u were no match for the mughals..in short u r pussies u hid in ur palaces and paid of the mughals to stay away. if u were such great warriors why did the kashmiri pandits (high priest of the hindu faith in India,kinda like vatican priests) run to the gurus for help.Why did they no go to a rajput king?
and about sikh force not conqering other parts of india,, because that movement was a religious movement not a movement to enforce power or rule. the reason why the sikh conquered kyber pass( afghanisatan) because that was a easily infiltration route for any invading army. so so called &#039;singh&#039; you shud get ur facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ singh ur a pussy jus to prove you  point u are manupulating history on this site. mughals where forcing rajputs to covert and  to save ur land rajputs where fighting the mughals but when cud not overpower them u married ur daughter to gain a political edge, typical for a coward to do..rajputs paid taxes to the mughals so that they are not raided, another example of cowardice&#8230; rajputs have been ancient warriors, tru, but u were no match for the mughals..in short u r pussies u hid in ur palaces and paid of the mughals to stay away. if u were such great warriors why did the kashmiri pandits (high priest of the hindu faith in India,kinda like vatican priests) run to the gurus for help.Why did they no go to a rajput king?<br />
and about sikh force not conqering other parts of india,, because that movement was a religious movement not a movement to enforce power or rule. the reason why the sikh conquered kyber pass( afghanisatan) because that was a easily infiltration route for any invading army. so so called &#8217;singh&#8217; you shud get ur facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: singh</title>
		<link>http://davidgillhespy.com/2009/06/deadliest-warrior-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 01:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgillhespy.com/?p=348#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Its a whole new religion!! that my point. what the hell is a new religion.Where were your sikh people in operation blue star. hindus were shaving your hair off. you sikhs had to borrow your wives cloths and pretend to be women,thats the act of cowards,not very deadly. this is all facts im stating.sikhs did not get rid of all the Mughals. they are many Mughals still alive today! they are beasts and would rip a sikh into shreds with there bare hands. if all the Rajputs and Mughals in the world got together and pissed once they could fill up enough area to drown the whole sikh faith. if the sikh were warriors then they would have featured in the show allready!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a whole new religion!! that my point. what the hell is a new religion.Where were your sikh people in operation blue star. hindus were shaving your hair off. you sikhs had to borrow your wives cloths and pretend to be women,thats the act of cowards,not very deadly. this is all facts im stating.sikhs did not get rid of all the Mughals. they are many Mughals still alive today! they are beasts and would rip a sikh into shreds with there bare hands. if all the Rajputs and Mughals in the world got together and pissed once they could fill up enough area to drown the whole sikh faith. if the sikh were warriors then they would have featured in the show allready!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jatt</title>
		<link>http://davidgillhespy.com/2009/06/deadliest-warrior-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>jatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 01:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidgillhespy.com/?p=348#comment-172</guid>
		<description>@akbar 
the sikh religion isn&#039;t a mix of no religion, its a whole new religion. sikhs saved these rajput&#039;s wives and daugheters from being raped by muslims. these rajputs couldn&#039;t even save their own women. 
sikhs fought off all the mughals and saved india. if it wasn&#039;t for them, india would&#039;ve been all converted into islam. i dont know if you&#039;re a muslim or a hindu but whatever you are u need to get ur facts straight. one sikh can kill 100s of muslims/rajputs. sikh warriors are going to be on the show just watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@akbar<br />
the sikh religion isn&#8217;t a mix of no religion, its a whole new religion. sikhs saved these rajput&#8217;s wives and daugheters from being raped by muslims. these rajputs couldn&#8217;t even save their own women.<br />
sikhs fought off all the mughals and saved india. if it wasn&#8217;t for them, india would&#8217;ve been all converted into islam. i dont know if you&#8217;re a muslim or a hindu but whatever you are u need to get ur facts straight. one sikh can kill 100s of muslims/rajputs. sikh warriors are going to be on the show just watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
